On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 12:12 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 3:08 PM Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> > wrote: > >> On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 5:43 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> > I'm personally still concerned about MADLib's licensing status. >> > Specifically speaking, where I feel more info is needed around >> > modifications to the BSD licensed code. None of that was in the legal >> > resolution. >> >> Can you please suggest how can this be resolved? I've stated my opinion, >> others stated theirs -- but how do we arrive at a either a consensus or >> a resolution? What's a mechanism here? >> > > Was there a clear statement on the code modifications? Last I saw, there > was an agreement for the imported code, but I thought I saw something > saying the modifications were apache licensed, which is confusing in the > current state. > > Either way, lets move this to legal discuss.
I filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-293 and provided links to the previous conversations around this subject. If there's a need to re-open that discussion I'd rather do it on the JIRA. Thanks, Roman. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
