On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 3:08 PM Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 5:43 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > wrote: > > I'm personally still concerned about MADLib's licensing status. > > Specifically speaking, where I feel more info is needed around > > modifications to the BSD licensed code. None of that was in the legal > > resolution. > > Can you please suggest how can this be resolved? I've stated my opinion, > others stated theirs -- but how do we arrive at a either a consensus or > a resolution? What's a mechanism here? > Was there a clear statement on the code modifications? Last I saw, there was an agreement for the imported code, but I thought I saw something saying the modifications were apache licensed, which is confusing in the current state. Either way, lets move this to legal discuss. > > Thanks, > Roman. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
