On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 3:30 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 11:09 PM Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> > wrote: > >> On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 8:01 PM, Niclas Hedhman <hedh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I haven't followed this issue, but if we take BSD licensed source and >> > modifies it (enough to claim copyright on the modifications) we >> re-license >> > to ALv2, but leaves the original BSD headers (if any) in the source. >> > >> > CatA licenses are CatA because they allow modifications on source and >> > re-license... >> >> Correct. Which seems to make Roy's proposal a superset of what you're >> talking >> about. Now, while we can debate whether we can accomplish something similar >> to what he was suggesting by some other means -- I'd rather vote for >> simplicity >> and go ahead with this: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-293?focusedCommentId=15873943&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15873943 >> >> At this point -- I just need to see if there's anybody who's strongly >> opposed this >> approach. >> > > Doing what you've outlined was my original request, so I have no qualms. > It had seemed to me that the preference was to not relicense. But I am > glad we are relicensing.
No we are not. See Mike's reply above. Thanks, Roman. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
