On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote: > On 07/06/17 17:53, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 8:32 AM, Sean Busbey <bus...@apache.org> wrote: >>> On 2017-06-06 11:59 (-0500), Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote: >>>> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 8:25 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> >>>> wrote: >>>>> While these are all great discussion points, I don't believe they're >>>>> relevant to incubator only and probably should have remained on the >>>>> legal-discuss list. Ignite graduated ~2 years ago. The incubator >>>>> probably >>>>> doesn't have an opinion about this, but it's good to know that the policy >>>>> may change (and I do personally have an opinion on said types of >>>>> software). >>>> >>>> The reason I'm bringing it on the IPMC mailing list has nothing to do >>>> with how long >>>> ago Ignite graduated and everything to do with the following two points: >>>> 1. It can be very useful to the future podlings >>>> 2. I honestly don't know any other forum where I can meaningfully >>>> discuss changes to release policy >>>> >>>> I'll take advice on #2, of course. >>> >>> >>> Who owns release policy? I presume it's VP Legal, which would suggest >>> legal-discuss. >> >> I would really be surprised if VP Legal actually *owned* it. This >> feels someplace between >> INFRA, ComDev and Legal, but it still doesn't answer the question >> who's a single throat >> to choke. > > Consider yourself surprised then. V.P. Legal owns the release policy.
Is legal-discuss then the appropriate forum to actually build the consensus? I surely hope V.P. Legal won't play a BDFL with our release policy, will he? Thanks, Roman. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
