Yes but as said we can fix in next release cycle. It's more an improvement than a blocker IMHO.
Regards JB Le 1 avr. 2018 à 10:10, à 10:10, Willem Jiang <willem.ji...@gmail.com> a écrit: >Hi Olivier > >NOTICE file is not supposed to include the copyright unless the License >requires. >As the MIT License already has the copyright statement, we don't need >to >specify it in the NOTCE file. > >I just copy the Justin's comments from the lega issue discussion[1] , >it >can explain lots of thing. > >"While including all of NOTICE is the safest/simplest way. > >INAL but I also think removal of obvious things that have been >documented >that shouldn't be there is also safe. i.e. > > - Don't include ASF duplicate ASF copyright/this product developed at > the ASF lines [1] >- Remove anything that should be in LICENSE (that is already there) >i.e. > MIT and BSD license information [2] > - Remove any copyright lines from MIT and BSD (but not ASL 2.0) >permissive licenses, who headers are still in place in their respective > files [3] > - Only include parts if they are bundled in your release [4] > >Perhaps also politely ask / provide a patch to the upstream project to >fix >their NOTICE file? > >1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#bundle-asf-product >2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps >3. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice >4. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#guiding-principle"; > >[1]https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-262 > > >Willem Jiang > >Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English) > http://jnn.iteye.com (Chinese) >Twitter: willemjiang >Weibo: 姜宁willem > >On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 8:38 AM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hi >> the content is simply. >> " >> >> Apache Gobblin >> >> Copyright 2017-2018 The Apache Software Foundation >> >> >> This product includes software developed at >> >> The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/). >> >> >> This product includes Bootstrap >> >> Copyright (c) 2011-2015 Twitter, Inc. >> >> >> This product includes the Glyphicons Halflings icon set >> >> Copyright (c) Jan Kovařík (http://glyphicons.com) >> >> Licensed under The MIT License (MIT) as a part of the Bootstrap >project. >> >> >> This product includes normalize.css >> >> Copyright (c) Nicolas Gallagher and Jonathan Neal >> " >> Can you please explain what is the legal problem with such content? >> TBH I can see so many similar content in a lot of TLP projects. So >why we >> should be more rude here than for other projects? >> >> >> On Sun, 1 Apr 2018 at 09:08, Justin Mclean <justinmcl...@me.com> >wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > -1 binding as NOTICE should not contain copyrights of bundled 3rd >party >> > software. The NOTICE file needs to only contain what is required >(and >> not >> > already in LICENSE) and needs to be as small as possible as it >affects >> > downstream projects. [2] >> > >> > I checked: >> > - incubating in name >> > - signatures and hashes good >> > - DISCLAIMER exists >> > - LICENSE is missing info for fonts [1] >> > - NOTICE is incorrect >> > - Some .sh files are missing ASF headers >> > - Can compile from source >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Justin >> > >> > 1. >> > apache-gobblin-incubating-sources-0.12.0/gobblin-admin/ >> src/main/resources/static/fonts/* >> > 2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice >> > >> > >> > >> > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> > >> > >> >> -- >> Olivier Lamy >> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy >>
