Hi, > It may not be clear to you, but it was discussed in the earlier vote thread. > See > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2b5fed22493e954937405cfd2553d06c00e5bee3b76be06b18b74862@%3Cdev.tuweni.apache.org%3E > for my noticing the jar still being present.
Noting its present and clearly indicating what the podlings future responsibility is in regards to this are perhaps seperate things. This is not a minor issue. I hope the podling realises this is the first time that a IPMC release with compiled code of this magnitude has been approved. A recent thread on legal would suggest that this should not be allowed due to licensing issues (even if we allow jars in source releases), and the thread on infra makes this the IPMC responsibility. I’ll leave it up the the PPMC and the mentors to consider the implications of that. In all previous IPMC votes that would of resulted in one or more -1 votes being cast and the podling asked to make another release candidate, especially considering that this was a issue that has occurred in a previous release candidate. Apache makes open source software, having a release with compiled code it it is not open source software and is against one of the core values of what we do. Thanks, Justin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
