Insanity. Just let Tuweni make a release, already. Stuff like this will get fixed eventually.
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 10:46 AM Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > It may not be clear to you, but it was discussed in the earlier vote > thread. See > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2b5fed22493e954937405cfd2553d06c00e5bee3b76be06b18b74862@%3Cdev.tuweni.apache.org%3E > for my noticing the jar still being present. > > Noting its present and clearly indicating what the podlings future > responsibility is in regards to this are perhaps seperate things. This is > not a minor issue. I hope the podling realises this is the first time that > a IPMC release with compiled code of this magnitude has been approved. A > recent thread on legal would suggest that this should not be allowed due to > licensing issues (even if we allow jars in source releases), and the thread > on infra makes this the IPMC responsibility. I’ll leave it up the the PPMC > and the mentors to consider the implications of that. In all previous IPMC > votes that would of resulted in one or more -1 votes being cast and the > podling asked to make another release candidate, especially considering > that this was a issue that has occurred in a previous release candidate. > Apache makes open source software, having a release with compiled code it > it is not open source software and is against one of the core values of > what we do. > > Thanks, > Justin > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
