Also I want to say that the intent is important when discussing many of these cases. In this case hopefully most of us we all agree, the original intention of the project community is to encourage broader participation of the community, rather than distributing un-released distribution.
TQ On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 5:26 PM Tianqi Chen <tqc...@cs.washington.edu> wrote: > It really depends on how do you interpret the github link as a un-released > distribution. A tarball of un-released source code is of course a > un-released distribution. It seems to be a bit broad to classify a github > link as a un-released distribution :) > > In most cases, github is one of the important places where community > developments(and possible issue answering) happen, and it seems to be OK > that the project community can choose to welcome their more developers to > work together, as per Apache way. > > Would be interesting ask INFRA about their position on this issue. > > TQ > > > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 5:11 PM Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I suggest you talk to Infra about this as this is their policy [1]. See >> "must not be advertised to anyone outside of the project development >> community”, having that on the front page does that IMO. >> >> Thanks, >> Justin >> >> 1. https://infra.apache.org/release-distribution.html#unreleased >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >>
