> > Hi Justin >
> I confirmed in the py4j-0.10.7-src.zip file, and the backport.py file > clearly states that it is all licensed under the PSF License. > > So can it be considered that py4j-0.10.7-src.zip is licensed under > BDS license, except that backport.py is under PSF license > > In this case, is it okay to have a separate description for the license of > the backport.py file? > > Best Regards! > > Casion > > > Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> 于2022年5月13日周五 16:05写道： > >> Hi, >> >> > 2. LICENSE is missing license from files in this zip It’s looks like >> > they are under the PSF License not the BSD license. >> > The license of the file py4j-0.10.7-src.zip does specify the BSD >> > license on their official website [1] >> > We specify py4j-0.10.7-src.zip in the LICENSE file under BSD licenses >> [2][3] >> >> The header of backport.py states: >> "Backported functions from later versions of python (mostly 2.7) These >> functions are all licensed under the PSF License." >> >> Kind Regards, >> Justin >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >
