Based on how Groovy joined Apache, it seems as though you can keep the same package name and work on renaming it in a major version if there's already binary compatibility concerns.
On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 7:14 AM PJ Fanning <fannin...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I'm creating a new thread to avoid filling the Pekko thread with emails that > are only partially related to the proposal. > > The current Akka code uses packages that start with 'akka.' and a lot of the > people involved with Pekko seem to prefer to keep the use 'pekko.' instead of > 'org.apache.pekko.' when we rename the Akka packages. > > Kafka and Netbeans are examples of Apache projects that don't use > 'org.apache' prefix in their package names. > > Is 'pekko.' a viable option or is there a strong preference within the ASF > and the Incubator PMC for 'org.apache.pekko.'? > > Regards, > PJ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
