Hi,

> 1. The measurement standard for past contributions is based on outstanding
> contributions such as playing a crucial role in creating the community,
> building transaction patterns, or submitting more than 30 PRs.

This is quite a high committer bar and could exclude people from contributing 
to your project. Do you intend to keep the commit bar this high, and why have 
you chosen such a high bar? It’s also important to note that people should be 
made committers for things other than code contributions, such as speaking at 
community events, documentation, and working on the website etc etc


> 2. For measuring activity, we expect participation in the community within
> the past year. As the community technology advances rapidly, long periods
> of absence can result in becoming unfamiliar or falling behind.
> 3. In the future, we expect him/her to invest more time in the community to
> help it grow.

This doesn't quite match up with “mert once given doesn’t expire” and would 
bias your committers to people who are employed full-time to work on the 
project.

You may want to reconsider both the initial commit list and the high commit 
bar. Initial committers who end up not contributing can be removed when the 
project graduates.

Kind Regards,
Justin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to