>> It seems the updated podling report template has not had the impact it was >> hoped to have around issues of branding and trademarks.
> For example, a doable mechanism is that, during each quarter's report, > the (P)PMC includes a section on what checks they did and if they > found any 3rdparty misuse. And this report to be included for TLPs also. Podlings are to be a TLP. Although we don't use TLP as an evidence for what to do incorrectly, if a TLP does the right thing, we should refer it as an example. Barely policy is hard to follow. The original podling report template asks "Is the PPMC managing the podling's brand / trademarks?" and a podling would answer YES because nothing is known to change the answer :D Best, tison. tison <wander4...@gmail.com> 于2023年12月29日周五 12:25写道： > > Thanks for starting this thread. As we actually evaluate the maturity > at how the podling complies with trademarks and branding, we'd better > provide certain guidelines for podlings to follow. > > I can understand TB10 TB20 TB30 after the recent discussions, but > perhaps it is still helpful if we extend the comments with more > examples as in the discussions - it makes what to do and what not to > do much more clear. > > > TB40 The project performs some monitoring of 3rd party use of its > > trademarks, addressing any instances of misuse. > > Do you have some examples of how podlings or TLPs perform this today? > It's unclear to me how I can understand and follow this guideline: > Shall the PMC check over the Internet? Is any 3rd party even with a > very low page rank should the PMC spend time to address it; or else > the PMC fail to meet this guideline? > > For example, a doable mechanism is that, during each quarter's report, > the (P)PMC includes a section on what checks they did and if they > found any 3rdparty misuse. > > Best, > tison. > > Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> 于2023年12月29日周五 10:54写道： > > > > Hi, > > > > It seems the updated podling report template has not had the impact it was > > hoped to have around issues of branding and trademarks. > > > > It was pointed out on the trademark list that the current maturity model > > [1] is missing checks for trademarks and branding. > > > > Here is my first attempt at it; feedback, thoughts, etc, are welcome. > > > > Trademarks and Branding > > TB10 The project correctly uses “Apache Foo” as the project name where > > required. > > TB20 The project complies with ASF’s branding and trademark policy in all > > places it controls.* > > TB30 The project resolves any potential trademark issue pointed out to it > > promptly. > > TB40 The project performs some monitoring of 3rd party use of its > > trademarks, addressing any instances of misuse. > > > > * Including its website, documentation, 3rd party download services or any > > other locations. > > > > With some changes and increased focus on security, we might want to review > > the existing points that mention security. > > > > Kind Regards, > > Justin > > > > 1. > > https://community.apache.org/apache-way/apache-project-maturity-model.html > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
