But there should be something adequate in addition to JBoss.
Steve Downey wrote:
LGPL probably isn't bad enough to prevent people from using it. So the drive
to create a BSD or Apache-style implementation hasn't exceeded the effort.
On Friday 25 October 2002 08:16 pm, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
But JBoss is. JBoss support EJB but has some features as a general app
server that are pretty sweet.
And as much as I wish we had something as good.... Jingoism aside....we
simply don't.
But I don't think JBoss is crying over not being an apache project at
the moment ;-)
I wish we did have something that supported a non-crappy interface like
EOB (eob.sourceforge.net) but had the high performance app server
facillies like JBoss.
Flame away!
-Andy
Paulo Gaspar wrote:
Jon's predictions never became truth...
...probably because J2EE is not interesting enough!
=;o)
Have fun,
Paulo Gaspar
-----Original Message-----
From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:nicolaken@;apache.org]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 9:09 AM
To: Jakarta General List
Subject: Re: Linux Magazine article
...
Some history info:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=java-apache-framework&m=97567909732611&w=
2
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:general-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:general-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:general-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:general-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:general-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:general-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
