On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 6/9/06, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
<snip/>
>
> Per the umbrella concern, the question then becomes what -- if any --
> are the mitigating factors that can address such a concern with
> regards to this proposal. Based on Hen's email, seems like the ball is
> still in the board's court -- as we wait for the next meeting -- so
> maybe its premature to discuss if we should be trying to address those
> comments yet?
I would also like to understand exactly what the problem is and what
mitigating steps may be possible. In particular, I would very much
appreciate a definition of "umbrella" that allows Geronimo, Logging,
Jakarta Commons, DB, XML, Web Services and Struts, but somehow
disallows Testing.
<snap/>
While it may make sense to say something along those lines in a larger
context, I do not believe this can be part of any central argument
towards the cause.
Yep, this was the basis of my previously weak case. :)
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
