On 6/9/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It makes sense that people want to be careful about a tl subdomain. Some of
the projects you mentioned are fairly staple diets to a good majority of
development projects. (ie struts/logging/xml/commons/etc) .
What would go into testing.apache.org?
<snip/>
Elements of the seed set (see Felipe's prior email) and over time,
other codebases with active developer support. Ofcourse, this is the
all important question, so all input is welcome, both on what should
go in and what shouldn't.
I'm all for it as testing in general
has to be good thing and there is potential for all sorts of shared support
if it is made easy to contribute into and collaborate on...Esp in the web
based items world.
At the same time, if it's not substantial looking enough it could
~potentially~ be viewed as a negative thing.
<snap/>
Not sure what you mean, but IIUC, probably not as high a concern,
since if jmeter.apache.org is substantial looking (see Hen's initial
email in this thread), then surely { jmeter , cactus , foo } is
substantial looking to me.
-Rahul
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
