On 10:12 Tue 14 Apr , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > > > Do you know any example where this will not work properly? I don't. > > Not currently but it's a spec compliance issue.
I don't think we want to slow down fast path without a real needs. > > The error status is printed originally, isn't it not sufficient? > > IMO it's not sufficient as redirection is not an error. It is handled as error in this patch, the only message is different. > > If not > > what about adding generic function which prints know error codes as > > string instead of handling some values separately? > > That's doable but a separate proposition IMO. This is better than doing duplicated status parsing flows. Sasha _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
