On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Sasha Khapyorsky <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10:12 Tue 14 Apr , Hal Rosenstock wrote: >> > >> > Do you know any example where this will not work properly? I don't. >> >> Not currently but it's a spec compliance issue. > > I don't think we want to slow down fast path without a real needs.
Isn't compliance a real need ? >> > The error status is printed originally, isn't it not sufficient? >> >> IMO it's not sufficient as redirection is not an error. > > It is handled as error in this patch, the only message is different. > >> > If not >> > what about adding generic function which prints know error codes as >> > string instead of handling some values separately? >> >> That's doable but a separate proposition IMO. > > This is better than doing duplicated status parsing flows. Sure but still separate IMO. -- Hal > Sasha _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
