On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Sasha Khapyorsky <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10:27 Tue 14 Apr , Hal Rosenstock wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Sasha Khapyorsky <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > On 10:12 Tue 14 Apr ?? ?? , Hal Rosenstock wrote: >> >> > >> >> > Do you know any example where this will not work properly? I don't. >> >> >> >> Not currently but it's a spec compliance issue. >> > >> > I don't think we want to slow down fast path without a real needs. >> >> Isn't compliance a real need ? > > It is complaint now - we agreed there are no cases yet when it is not.
Huh ? What we agreed on was there was no known use right now but that doesn't mean a compliance test couldn't detect this. That's what compliance means to me. -- Hal > Sasha _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
