On 13:12 Tue 14 Apr , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > Huh ? What we agreed on was there was no known use right now
Yes, this is what I meant. > but that > doesn't mean a compliance test couldn't detect this. That's what > compliance means to me. In this patch is not "for free", but in cost of fast execution fast path slowing down. I prefer to keep it is now (and of course remember about hypothetical issue). And status string message would be better to generically. Such solution is cleaner, not much harder and should be beneficial and useful in general (and for redirection cases too). Sasha _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
