maillog: 20/01/2005-09:57:24(-0500): Chris Gianelloni types > On Thu, 2005-01-20 at 14:11 +0900, Georgi Georgiev wrote: > > > To see what I mean -- gpg --refresh-keys [EMAIL PROTECTED] and verify the > > signature of this message. The latest uid that I just created has no > > name associated with it, so no need for an ID, right? I just need to > > prove that [EMAIL PROTECTED] is my address, right? > > Say what? No. You would be signed that [EMAIL PROTECTED] is Georgi > Georgiev and has the key ID 44F51266.
Really? But I was talking about signing only the UID that has no name. > Adding another uid to the same > key, with or without a name, won't change that. Also, when you sign, it > asks you if you want to sign all the uid for the key. I would say "no" > to that and only sign the one I have verified myself. Yes. So don't sign the UIDs that have names. Only the anonymous one. -- \/ Georgi Georgiev \/ "You've heard Al Gore say he invented the \/ /\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ Internet. Well, if he was so smart, why do /\ \/ +81(90)6266-1163 \/ all the addresses begin with 'W'?" George \/ /\ ------------------- /\ W. Bush October 28, 2000 /\
pgpevXQUpV6bH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
