On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 09:21:34AM -0400, Ned Ludd wrote: > > > > First of all, I'm in limbo on this. Certainly not dead set against it. If > > this were to be used, I'd like to add the following line: "At least 1 of > > these three must be actively involved in the development of the package > > manager". > > Please don't change your wording on that. The feel really strongly > about the primary pkg manager of Gentoo needing remain under the full > control of Gentoo Linux. >
Agreed, I'm of the opinion it would be inappropriate to let an outside entity steer our primary package manager. -- Jon Portnoy avenj/irc.freenode.net -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
