On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 03:27:53PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 15:09:24 +0200 Harald van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | You're suggesting jakub maybe shouldn't even be a Gentoo dev because > | he *doesn't* give one unofficial overlay special treatment over > | another? > > One unofficial project that has screwed up so badly that the council > has had to step in and say no to it,
It's entirely possible that I missed some important message, but as far as I know, council hasn't said either yes or no to it, and the overlay as hosted on o.g.o is suspended only until a council decision is made. > as opposed to an unofficial > project that has not attracted complaints and that is being worked into > the tree? Quoting the original message: "Until the council makes a firm decision about non-gentoo hosted overlays, this will be the defining method of dealing with them." Please explain to me how any non-gentoo hosted overlay can possibly be an exception to this. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
