On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 18:07 +0200, Harald van Dijk wrote: > On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 11:11:15AM -0400, Seemant Kulleen wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 15:09 +0200, Harald van Dijk wrote: > > > You're suggesting jakub maybe shouldn't even be a Gentoo dev because he > > > *doesn't* give one unofficial overlay special treatment over another? > > > > The jave "unofficial" overlay is well on its way to becoming an official > > and officially hosted overlay. > > And once it is, it can be given special treatment.
We're talking around each other, let's stop. I'm not advocating that the overlay keywords for sunrise cease -- as I stated in another part of this thread: I do not care one way or the other. I don't think it is appropriate, however, to make other projects hostage because you don't like what's going on with your pet project. > Maybe discussions have been focused on policy more than development > itself, but for the most part (yes, there have been exceptions), they > have still been focused on Gentoo. You seem to be making it personal, > which is over the line for me. I'm pretty sure I have not made it personal. I'm not addressing any one in particular on these, nor do I have anything against any parties (or for any parties for that matter). I'm sorry if you took my words that way, that was certainly not the intent from this side. > Your frustration is understandable, but I think you took it out on the > wrong message, and very possibly the wrong person. I know what I did, and they were both the correct target. We can take this off-list and include Jakub himself in it, if you're dying to know. I think Jakub himself knows full well *exactly* where I came from and why. Thanks, Seemant -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
