Harald van Dijk wrote: >> If the stubs were to be just removed say tomorrow, and breakage in the >> tree is still of such an extend that bugs starts to flood in again, its >> not just you that will have to read the mail. If the user is clueless, >> then Jakub have to reassign the bug to either toolchain or the package >> maintainer. If he could not determine it was due to the missing CFLAG, > > The error is very clear: > cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-fno-stack-protector" > > Maybe I have a little bit more confidence in people, sorry if that's > misplaced. :)
Erm, yeah I can recognize the error, but it's really not very productive to dupe the bugs over and over again. Killing the stubs breaks glibc compile [1] and it breaks perl compile [2] as well. [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101471 [2] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106965 I don't really see how is this a good idea to break two pretty critical packages for users that have no clue what USE=vanilla does w/ gcc. -- Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E ... still no signature ;)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
