Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 14:00 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: >> Oh, gimme a break. Screaming about it on -dev for hundreds of posts >> isn't just equivalent to a vote, it's better. It makes people think >> there's more than 2 developers opposed to it. > > Really? Even you didn't remember that *I* was opposed to Sunrise and > probably accounted for at least a good 50 responses. Yes, good came > from it. Yes, it could have been done much, much better.
Sunrise is a poor example for me, because I ignored all the discussion on it past a certain point. It was just rehashing the same points over, and over, and over... > Hopefully, to streamline processes and give power back to individual > projects to govern themselves in internal matters and let people get > back to doing development. That's a goal I would love to see us strive > to achieve in the next year. From what I see, projects are pretty free to govern themselves. How do you see it differently? As Weeve said, he's still trying to get people to stop breaking SPARC keywords, just like 3 years ago. It's just when trying to do anything larger than a single project that you run into issues. Thanks, Donnie
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
