On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 08:56 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote: > Ok, the list definitely isn't accurate. If there is a legitimate reason > to mask sylpheed-claws-1.x you also have to mask it's reverse deps. > However I'm still waiting for the explanation why it is on that list. > (I don't mind if it's masked for a good reason, but I need to know > that reason). >
There is no immediate reason, of course. However, gtk+-1 and glib-1 will be removed as soon after the big cleanup as is feasible, and sylpheed-clasws-1.x is a gtk+-1 app, and therefore must go as well. I didn't generate the list, but my understanding was that it was intended to include all packages with a hard dep on gtk+-1, in addition to gnome 1.x. Daniel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
