On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 15:52:30 +0530 "Nirbheek Chauhan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Interesting to note, however, that Paludis doesn't accept inline > >> comments, and this behaviour predates PMS. > > > > Paludis behaviour there matches Portage behaviour at the time it was > > written, except that instead of proceeding with garbage values, > > Paludis gives an error. > > Well, then it should be updated to match current Portage behaviour. > PMS is not supposed to document "How portage worked at one point of > time" or "The intersection of the capabilities of Portage and > Paludis". It should follow the current portage's behaviour as closely > as possible.
Do you really want to make it impossible to install Gentoo using the most recent official release? Because that's what will happen if we do what you're suggesting... -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
