On 13 Jun 2008, at 12:18, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
"We're writing a spec that's somewhat like Portage, but where it breaks Paludis, we prefer to get Portage to change it's behaviour instead. Don't crib about this however. We could just have easily have created a whole new spec which broke Portage completely."
Care to give an example instead of FUDing? Paludis is written to match PMS, not the other way around. And when PMS changes, Paludis is changed to reflect such changes.
Don't be childish. - ferdy -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
