On Thursday 19 June 2008 18:06:17 Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> In this case the attacks seem to be targeting a person who has been
> attacking an entire ~300 person project for a few years now.

Is it considered acceptable to attack someone as long as the attacker thinks 
they deserve it?

> I honestly don't see how you are contributing to this project in general,

Well, I'm no vapier, but I have filed the occasional bug, submitted the 
occasional patch, that sort of thing.

> or in particular how you intend to contribute to this project by protecting
> ciaranm against this project.

21:28 < dberkholz@> jmbsvicetto: bheekling did an outstanding job of stepping 
in on that thread and one or two others. he's setting a great role model for 
what the rest of us should do
21:30 <jmbsvicett > let me read the mails again.
21:30 <Ford_Prefe > I guess peer-directed intolerance for bad behaviour is 
really the ideal solution for this
21:30 <jmbsvicett > skim*
21:33 <jmbsvicett > dberkholz: hmm, I can't find any mesage from bheekling on 
the -dev ml. Different name on the from address?
21:33 <Ford_Prefe > 
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_4211dc4054de30f2ff52f6f8a2e2466e.xml 
might be it
21:33 <      rane > Nirbheek
21:34 < dberkholz@> yeah, that's him.
21:34 <Ford_Prefe > (name is right, this might be the thread dberkholz is 
referring to)
21:34 <      rane > or sth like that
21:34 <      rane > no idea if it's his real name
21:34 <jmbsvicett > thanks
21:34 < dberkholz@> the specific post i had in mind was a wikipedia reference 
to flames and personal attacks
21:35 <      rane > yeah, this new idea of people telling others they are 
behaving like jerks
21:35 <      rane > it looks like it worked
21:35 <Ford_Prefe > Indeed
21:40 <      rane > silent majority stepping in and kicking ass
21:40 <      rane > a great idea indeed
21:47 <Ford_Prefe > Maybe we can have a won't-tolerate-bad-behaviour 
pledge. :P

-- 
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Reply via email to