Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 04:22:02PM +0200, Tiziano M?ller wrote: >> And this is where the second GLEP comes in: >> http://dev.gentoo.org/~dev-zero/glep/glep-xsd.html > Don't remove the DTD DOCTYPE line. Leave it there. > Let simple tools be able to use the DTD to validate the well-formedness, > then upgrade to the XSD to check the actual semantics of the file. >
Very good point, thanks. But the changes of GLEP 46 can't be validated without allowing the "status" attribute for the toplevel maintainer. But I guess we could do it as long as it's documented (and commented) correctly. -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
