On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 10:03:10PM +0200, Tiziano M?ller wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 04:22:02PM +0200, Tiziano M?ller wrote: > >> And this is where the second GLEP comes in: > >> http://dev.gentoo.org/~dev-zero/glep/glep-xsd.html > > Don't remove the DTD DOCTYPE line. Leave it there. > > Let simple tools be able to use the DTD to validate the well-formedness, > > then upgrade to the XSD to check the actual semantics of the file. > Very good point, thanks. But the changes of GLEP 46 can't be validated > without allowing the "status" attribute for the toplevel maintainer. But I > guess we could do it as long as it's documented (and commented) correctly. Sure. In other places where DTD->XSD migrations have been done, there ARE still changes made to the DTD for new elements/attributes etc.
-- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux Developer & Infra Guy E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85
pgprIhTAdYQh0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
