-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > 2008-08-02 04:02:48 Zac Medico napisał(a): > The names of other RESTRICT values are related to features which are > restricted. The new proposed value is intended for live ebuilds so its > name should be negation of this feature. I think that something like > RESTRICT=constant-sources would be better.
Honestly I don't care about whatever the convention is but if people prefer some other name then that fine with me because the name really makes no difference to me. Zac -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkiUMwEACgkQ/ejvha5XGaPMJQCfR9L0OWipq1Mi3n8SrcOG5SdI ZekAoLV/JMLaA7Om2RbxfhTIgdX0nqmi =I0P1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
