On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 4:36 AM, Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: >> 2008-08-02 04:02:48 Zac Medico napisał(a): >> The names of other RESTRICT values are related to features which are >> restricted. The new proposed value is intended for live ebuilds so its >> name should be negation of this feature. I think that something like >> RESTRICT=constant-sources would be better. > > Like I've said before, that particular convention is pretty > worthless in my eyes. I'd much prefer RESTRICT=live-sources if we > want to use a longer name.
How about we just skip the reversed-boolean-usage/it's-a-long-name confusion/argument and just call it RESTRICT=tarballs ? I know not all distfiles are tarballs, but it gets the message across far better than "constant-sources" IMO :o) -- ~Nirbheek Chauhan
