-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 29/09/12 11:45 AM, hasufell wrote: > On 09/29/2012 05:37 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > >> There isn't so much a problem with the current >> python-distutils-ng eclass but rather it's to expand it to a more >> comprehensive replacement for both distutils and python eclasses. >> In order to do that efficiently, most of the core functionality >> should be moved so that the new distutils is more like a wrapper >> to the new python. > >> This could certainly be done by patching the existing eclass, but >> mgorny wants to use new eclass names instead of keeping the >> current one. Hence the rename. I think that's about it.. > > > In that case we are missing 95% of the features of python.eclass. >
Aha, but do we really -need- 95% of the features? :) Personally (this is my investment in this project) I'd just like to see non-distutils ebuilds needing python support using PYTHON_TARGETS. Also, I'd like to see that anything at all which new-distutils (whatever it be called) might need the old python.eclass for be integrated into new-distutils (probably via new-python). -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlBnGKkACgkQ2ugaI38ACPCUGQD/f2tf7bjyxkq52In7OrH+nDSL nWLUWc9btwRm3Uuyd3AA/3tFI8uOiqpAVS7Ze4ScCt1UHi7LdvXgYGZRxPbJUbvS =4o7s -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
