-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 09/29/2012 05:50 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > On 29/09/12 11:45 AM, hasufell wrote: >> On 09/29/2012 05:37 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > >>> There isn't so much a problem with the current >>> python-distutils-ng eclass but rather it's to expand it to a >>> more comprehensive replacement for both distutils and python >>> eclasses. In order to do that efficiently, most of the core >>> functionality should be moved so that the new distutils is more >>> like a wrapper to the new python. > >>> This could certainly be done by patching the existing eclass, >>> but mgorny wants to use new eclass names instead of keeping the >>> current one. Hence the rename. I think that's about it.. > > >> In that case we are missing 95% of the features of >> python.eclass. > > > Aha, but do we really -need- 95% of the features?
Yeah, maybe not. But that should be discussed beforehand imo. So that we really design this eclass together. Otherwise I fear we will end up getting a 4th implementation... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQZxmzAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzi2AIAKQjjlbuf8K3TUFGmXPldTi4 sQJhwZjo4sngQF1zql4K2RJHnx2R6qsr/YteZ/4ek2yTg356oqkMjAyk5BV5Dpv8 shJugkgvAd3iZWVOUqQEMjxl+Rd3wRmgAw5oC+EEXrck6vOOgQbla/RdLwYFstkP 5Pmp+0hnksRcAnGhOiw7W0JLBJzuhPjoeUGdXVVVwuaPIzlgis0Jv8fSMeP4jxpT vM5EOuvrwpM+gJzkpH0ABCdVHMyigufXCKED11JOrRTUA1fgT2XoWBMCblBoMXtH e6WzUT5NojLlHn4E3psqy3kA4bqzRdMm6u3Iw4bPLFnl0vUaCGYqVfvL1OYkTU4= =gbNx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
