On 17/01/2013 14:19, Alexis Ballier wrote: > Nice mix of two different hats. I liked to think the tinderbox was > something you were doing for gentoo QA, but it seems it serves also > your personal wars...
I'm not on payroll for either hat so I don't see any conflict with that. The tinderbox is a _personal_ effort, among other reasons because otherwise I would be able to force some other developers to care about the bugs instead of closing them as NEEDINFO because they don't like the way they are presented. And I would probably be able to demand people to act on them instead of keeping 1500 of those bugs open at any time. And since I'm a person, and as I said I'm not paid to do this work (the bandwidth and hosting is sponsored by my employer, who uses libav in production, and the rest of the running costs are on me), I can't see how you expect me to disregard insults that have been pointed to me over time. ffmpeg is in the same list as paludis and will not, ever, be tested on my boxes, as long as it's a personal effort. Are you going to pay me to run it? If the answer is no, please fuck off or run your own. And I also told you this before, if you want to be so scandalized by it right now, you either have a very shallow memory or you're looking to make a mountain of a molehill. Finally, I would like to point out that I haven't said anything one way or the other regarding the default — I haven't even tried to push for the change beforehand even though that's the one I tested. I just refuted the statement of "the tree not being ready for libav" putting on record that there is no indication that ffmpeg's situation is much different, as it is not currently being tested by me (and nobody else is doing the testing, so there). -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
