On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 15:10:18 +0100 Diego Elio Pettenò <flamee...@flameeyes.eu> wrote:
> On 17/01/2013 15:00, Alexis Ballier wrote: > > I was only pointing out that ffmpeg isn't a one person thing, it's > > much more that this one (or more) person who insulted you. > > You weren't pointing that out at all: > > > > > Nice mix of two different hats. I liked to think the tinderbox was > > something you were doing for gentoo QA, but it seems it serves also > > your personal wars... > > Tell me where you pointed out "that ffmpeg isn't a one person thing" > in that phrase? Please top with the bullshit, thank you very much. You are playing on words and becoming aggressive. I was, indeed, not 'pointing out' but rather suggesting... and maybe it wasn't clear but I wasn't writing about who develops it but rather who uses and benefits from it. I believe we all agree that ffmpeg being part of Gentoo, me caring about it, makes it fall under Gentoo QA umbrella which in turns benefits the whole community... > > I am using it, > > Gentoo is using it, some upstreams are using it, and all of them > > would benefit from a tinderbox run. > > And all of them are invited to either decide to let me decide how to > spend my time and dime, or actually pay me for said time. > > > What scandalizes me is that you put my work for Gentoo in the same > > bag as this silly ffmpeg/libav war. > > I haven't. Don't put words in my mouth, or in my keyboard. I have only > said I don't want to care about ffmpeg, and I have the right not to as > NOBODY IS PAYING ME TO DO THAT KIND OF WORK. It's all your right. So is mine to point out you are refusing to help me in my gentoo work because you hate upstream of the package I'm working on. I feel sad for being sent to one side of this silly war just because I'm happy with ffmpeg and want to provide the alternative (*) to our users... [...] (*) Alternative which I indeed still consider superior. This may change in the future. Alexis.
