On 17 January 2013 22:05, Diego Elio Pettenò <flamee...@flameeyes.eu> wrote: > On 17/01/2013 14:57, Ben de Groot wrote: >> After some initial bikeshedding we came to the conclusion that naming >> the category simply "qt" is the most elegant solution. We will then >> also be dropping the qt- prefix in package names. This means >> x11-libs/qt-core will be moved to qt/core, and so on. > > Please don't. Right now we have only one category which is not foo-bar > and that's virtual... I'm pretty sure it's going to break some > assumption to change that...
But is there any reason other than "assumption" to stick to foo-bar category names? One alternative we did come up with is qt-framework, since that is what upstream also uses (though mostly it's plain Qt), since it's a collection of libraries and applications. -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer Gentoo Qt project lead, Gentoo Wiki admin
