On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 15:05:53 +0100 Diego Elio Pettenò <flamee...@flameeyes.eu> wrote: > On 17/01/2013 14:57, Ben de Groot wrote: > > After some initial bikeshedding we came to the conclusion that > > naming the category simply "qt" is the most elegant solution. We > > will then also be dropping the qt- prefix in package names. This > > means x11-libs/qt-core will be moved to qt/core, and so on. > > Please don't. Right now we have only one category which is not foo-bar > and that's virtual... I'm pretty sure it's going to break some > assumption to change that...
Which is a good thing, since it will force people to stop making incorrect assumptions. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
