On Wed, 7 Aug 2013 14:43:12 -0400 Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 3. Everybody else can pitch in and help out so that you're not having > to reformat all those bugs on your own. This will increase the noise, we're still going to need to implement some kind of trivial edit flag and list to allow this to be filtered. > By all means propose whatever makes the most sense to you personally. > It will no doubt be bikeshed to death but we don't need 100% consensus > to move forward. The discussion, at least on the bug this thread is about; was already done, so, it doesn't need another discussion and has to be documented. I don't think we care too much about the other trivial edits... > If necessary the council can bless it, but I suspect > that most will see the logic of your arguments, and perhaps together > we'll even improve on it a little. If really really needed, that's the way to go; but I don't think people object, unless mrueg intents to really object the actual change other than stating it is undocumented and noise. He hasn't stated reasoning on why it is objected though, so there's no reason to pursue that yet. If we go that road, we'll have to take it to the council again later if we introduce an atom field in Bugzilla; I see in #gentoo-bugs that kensington has done some preliminary work on that, so we might be seeing this in some near future. -- With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
