On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 16:28:47 +0300 Samuli Suominen <ssuomi...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 03/06/14 16:20, Tom Wijsman wrote: > > Ehm, no, version 0.9.23-r3 controls that with a systemd USE flag; > > No, it doesn't. Nevermind, `cvs up`-ed; heh, I don't understand how you've got to that change, I thought there only was a problem with 0.99.0? > > in comparison, 0.99.0 mainly wants you to run it with systemd: > > "mainly", as in, since 0.99.0 removed support for hibenate/suspend > in favour of systemd, the power/session managers need to integrate > their own hibernate/suspend support diffently. Ah, right; thinking of MATE, I understand the 0.99.0 bit now. > > 26 May 2014; Samuli Suominen <ssuomi...@gentoo.org> > > upower-0.99.0.ebuild: This release is mainly for use with > > sys-apps/systemd because upstream removed support for > > sys-power/pm-utils completely from git master. The 0.9 branch is > > for sys-power/pm-utils use. Adjust ebuild accordingly. > > > > Though I'm a bit confused why 0.99.0 doesn't list a systemd > > dependency; I thought it had one, but maybe it is in another > > package I'm unaware of. > > > > Outdated ChangeLog entry from March, those were the facts we dealt > back then, > only partly true anymore, consumers have evolved Which means that the situation I am assuming right now is outdated; so, if you don't mind feel free to highlight why 0.9.23-r3 needs systemd. -- With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
