I can spend some time with the tinderbox on 4.9 but the maintainers will have to accept that the logs will be linked and not attached.
(This being the main reason why I stopped bothering unless people asked me explicitly, given how many times someone closed my bugs with NEEDINFO because the logs were not attached.) Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ On 18 October 2014 08:51, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." <phajdan...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On 10/13/14 1:38 AM, viv...@gmail.com wrote: > > have you considered to stabilize gcc:4.9 instead possibly 4.9.2 ? > > I'm not really suggesting to do so, but seem that most of the problems > > of 4.9.1 are the same of 4.8.3 so maybe it's worth considering. > > > > Il 11/10/2014 13:57, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." ha scritto: > >> We'll really need gcc-4.8 in stable within 6-12 weeks from now. Chromium > >> starts making heavy use of C++11 language features, see > >> <http://chromium-cpp.appspot.com/> . I don't realistically see us being > >> able to just patch chromium to work around that. > > > > for 4.9.2 the 6-12 week window could be a problem > > Yeah, I don't think we can go straight to 4.9 without the latter > spending time in ~arch, and for now it's still hard masked. > > Paweł > >
