If you write the code for that, be my guest. But the code is in Ruby and does not open the bug directly (only links to a pre-filled bug form).
When I wrote it, Python was definitely not among my strong languages. While I can probably write it now, I don't have the time. As I said I'm happy to volunteer my time to run the tinderbox and file the bugs. But I won't do so if all I'm going to get back is bitching. It seems a fair proposal to me. Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ On 18 October 2014 12:59, Pacho Ramos <pa...@gentoo.org> wrote: > El sáb, 18-10-2014 a las 12:35 +0100, Diego Elio Pettenò escribió: > > I can spend some time with the tinderbox on 4.9 but the maintainers > > will have to accept that the logs will be linked and not attached. > > > > > > (This being the main reason why I stopped bothering unless people > > asked me explicitly, given how many times someone closed my bugs with > > NEEDINFO because the logs were not attached.) > > > > Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes > > flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ > > > > What is the main reason for not being able to attach them to the bugs > (as normally is done with other bug reports not related with tinderbox)? > Wouldn't be possible to, once they are stored on your amazon webservice > account, use wget to download them and attach them using pybugz for > example? > > > >
