On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 01:41:06 -0400 Mike Frysinger <vap...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 19 Apr 2016 04:21, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > > Ühel kenal päeval, E, 18.04.2016 kell 12:38, kirjutas Mike Frysinger: > > > On 16 Apr 2016 09:23, Patrick Lauer wrote: > > > > So why on earth are we applying a random patch that upstream is not > > > > using > > > > > > not everyone uses glibc, and glibc *is* moving in this > > > direction. Gentoo > > > is simply accelerating the change ... otherwise glibc will take > > > longer to do the actual migration. > > > > You don't need to break everyone's ~arch for dubious glibc benefits, > > which could be done by a p.masked version and a tinderbox run. > > I am not your tinderbox dummy having to waste time on this to maintain > > my own ~arch stuff. > > i waited until the known bugs died down. i don't have access to a > tinderbox system myself. Cut the nonsense. You clearly didn't even test that glibc version on a single system. If you did, you'd notice the core system packages failing to build. -- Best regards, Michał Górny <http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/>
pgpChCrHybOhZ.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
