On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 1:48 AM, Robin H. Johnson <robb...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 01:04:17AM -0500, Walter Dnes wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 09:49:59PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote
>> >
>> > So, should we clean up / rename packages that do not follow this as we
>> > find them, like my ConfigArgParse example?
>>
>> find /usr/portage -name *.ebuild | grep [A-Z] | sed "s/-[0-9].*//" | sort -u 
>> > upper.txt
>
> There's a double-packaged case that stands out:
> dev-python/shapely
> sci-libs/Shapely
> (Both use the same pypi source)

Thanks for pointing that out.

It looks like sci-libs/Shapely has been around longer, so I have
converted reverse deps on dev-python/shapely over to it and masked the
latter.

Reply via email to