On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 11:01:32 -0500
Mike Gilbert <flop...@gentoo.org> wrote:

> On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 1:48 AM, Robin H. Johnson <robb...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 01:04:17AM -0500, Walter Dnes wrote:  
> >> On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 09:49:59PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote  
> >> >
> >> > So, should we clean up / rename packages that do not follow this as we
> >> > find them, like my ConfigArgParse example?  
> >>
> >> find /usr/portage -name *.ebuild | grep [A-Z] | sed "s/-[0-9].*//" | sort 
> >> -u > upper.txt  
> >
> > There's a double-packaged case that stands out:
> > dev-python/shapely
> > sci-libs/Shapely
> > (Both use the same pypi source)  
> 
> Thanks for pointing that out.
> 
> It looks like sci-libs/Shapely has been around longer, so I have
> converted reverse deps on dev-python/shapely over to it and masked the
> latter.

There is a bug open for 3 weeks now [1]. I'm surprised that nobody
fixed it before. Could you update it, please?

[1]:https://bugs.gentoo.org/599306

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/>

Attachment: pgpsEzUds5ylr.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to