On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 12:19:23AM +0300, Scharf Yuval wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I don't understand your answer Nicolas.
> Because My bus is 33MHz I get 27MB/s. I understand that.

He's saying you get 27MB/s because your drive is capable of that
data rate. It doesn't matter how fast your bus is if that's the
limit for the drive.

Nathan Meyers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> What I'm asking is if the UDMA(100) means that the HD is capable of
> 100MB/s and the bus holds it back. Does it mean that with a newer
> motherboard my HD will work much faster?
> 
> Yuval Scharf
> 
> 
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Nicolas STURMEL wrote:
> 
> > Scharf Yuval wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Can someone explain to me the following log messages from the kernel:
> > >
> > > ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx
> > > ICH2: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev f9
> > > ICH2: chipset revision 2
> > > ICH2: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
> > >   ide0: BM-DMA at 0xff00-0xff07, BIOS settings: hda:DMA, hdb:pio
> > >   ide1: BM-DMA at 0xff08-0xff0f, BIOS settings: hdc:DMA, hdd:DMA
> > > hda: 39102336 sectors (20020 MB) w/512KiB Cache, CHS=2434/255/63, UDMA(100)
> > >
> > > Using `hdparm -t /dev/hda5` I get ~27MB/s.
> > > Does it mean that my bus holds back my HD.
> > > Shouldn't I get 100MB/s?
> > > Can I do something to improve performance.
> > >
> >
> > What a 'hdparm' day ;-)
> >
> > Just read the manual pageof hdparm and you will see that the '-t' flag
> > only gives your _Hard Drive_ speed. And a 27MB/s data rate is quite
> > corect for an IDE Hard Drive.
> > My latest Seagate Barracuda is given at 55MB/s, and my old Baracuda IV
> > 80GB is given at 30MB/s.
> > In fact, i do not think that hdparm can easily reach the theorical IDE
> > bus speed, as the '-T' flag ( the second of the only two bench flags I
> > know ) gives system mem-buffer I/O speed.
> >
> > --
> > Nicolas
> >
> >
> > --
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
> >
> >
> 
> 
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
> 
> 
> 

-- 

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Reply via email to