-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Thanks for your comments. I read a couple forum posts that laptop users preferred mm-sources over the development-sources. As soon as OpenOffice.org 1..1 finish compiling, I will compile the 2.6 kernel.
Since I want to keep my 2.4.22 kernels, what should I do to make sure I do not lose the config files for these kernels? When I upgraded from 2.4 to 2.4.22, I remember removing the old configs in /usr/src/linux. Will I do the same. I read in the a couple people mentioning to cd into /usr/src/linux-beta and compiling from there. Kevin On Friday 17 October 2003 06:00 pm, Jason Stubbs wrote: > On Saturday 18 October 2003 01:33, Kevin Miller, Jr. wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > I have decided that I wanted to give the 2.6 kernel a try. Right now I > > am debating on which kernel to use, the development-sources or the > > mm-sources. I am currently using a Dell Inspiron 8100 notebook. Any > > recommendations? > > Try the development-sources first. mm-sources has patches for better > desktop performance but often breaks things. If you try the > development-sources first you will at least know what breaks and what > doesn't before getting even more experimental. > > > Also, if I add the 2.6 kernel, will it affect my other 2.4.22 kernels > > (ac-sources and ck-sources)? Is there something I should do before I > > compile the 2.6 kernel? > > Everything that you need has all the proper deps put in place in portage. > If you install manually, check one of the ebuilds to see what deps are > required. > > Jason > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/kKpRP2TQUAjSykARAlTeAJ4uNvzCy9JOJjsFPpKoRz/8uD3LegCeMJn5 avzJ0ADE50qWhyBPJfPLGDM= =E+nc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
