Joseph wrote: >On Sun, 2005-06-12 at 21:10 +0300, Rumen Yotov wrote: > > >>Joseph wrote: >> >> >> >>>How do you replace revdep-rebuild, it is not in ebuild? >>>I solved the problem by recompiling OO from source instead of binary. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>Hi, >>Revdep-rebuild is in portage-package, as '/usr/bin/revdep-rebuild'. >>It's a shell-script, no need to compile it, just to unpack/place it. >>You could copy the new one over the old one (make a backup first). >>Later check the flags/permissions etc. >>HTH. Rumen >> >> > >I just checked, revdep-rebuild is part of gentoolkit package. My >installed version is the same one as the stable one in portage ver. >0.2.0 >If that scrip would change the version of gentoolkit would be increase. >So it would mean I have the most current one, is my understanding >correct? > > > Hi, When i first replied had some suspisions about revdep-rebuild being in 'gentoolkit', so checked with "qpkg -l portage | grep revdep-rebuild" and there it was in portage, should have listened to my inner voice and checked by: "qpkg -f -v /usr/bin/revdep-rebuild" - result: app-portage/gentoolkit-0.2.1_pre2. So it's 'gentoolkit'. Seems that using: equery,qpkg,etcat could sometimes give different results ;) (what about qfile). @Holly: haven't checked but remember the patch is to get portage.py correctly check the new vars introduced by revdep-rebuild, i think it must by applied using "patch". HTH. Rumen
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
