Am 28.11.2010 19:53, schrieb App Deb: > On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 7:39 PM, walt <w41...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I'm confused about which of all these various mechanisms apply to single-cpu >> machines. AFAICT Con's BFS (e.g.) is really a CPU scheduler and doesn't >> affect >> single-cpu machines very much. What about CFQ and group scheduling? >> Others? >> >> Thanks for any clues. > > Don't mix them, > > CFS --> upstream official CPU scheduler (also supports cgroups, that > got used in the 200line patch, which is useless imo) > CFQ --> upstream official I/O (disk) scheduler (afaik the only one > that supports "ionice") >
CFQ also supports cgroup related I/O scheduling. Enable option CFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
